Thread: Rubber Treads Anyone?
View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 00:29
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Rough-top conveyor belting
Posted by Steve Shade.   [PICTURE: SAME | NEW | HELP]


Coach on team #7, Knights, from Parkville High School and NASA GSFC / Black & Decker / Raytheon / AAI.

Posted on 11/29/2000 6:32 PM MST


In Reply to: Re: Rough-top conveyor belting posted by Matt Leese on 11/29/2000 5:43 PM MST:



Matt:
The reason it didn't look like it did as much was because of the location of the dirve system. The dirve system needed more weight on top of the axis of the drive wheels. If we would have had that, then the drive would have performed differently. The good thing about using the belting, we didn't have to take a Wizzard to the wheels every 3rd match to get some more traction.

Steve


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.