Quote:
Originally Posted by writchie
I suspect the Cisco example showed access points spread apart by some tens of meters. This is enough to reduce the interference seen at the access points.
|
Cisco had their access points only ten feet from each other and sent all of the data from a single point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by writchie
I have no idea what 5.47% crosstalk interference means.
|
It means that through extrapolation of the power curves of a wireless network the percentage above -30dB is 5.47% of the area with respect to a full power range.
Quote:
Originally Posted by writchie
I would expect that the total combined throughput of the 6 networks you suggest would be well below that of a single network. Operating 6 robots on 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 would probably not be too pretty, especially with synchronous traffic. When the robots are in close proximity, they will overwhelm the signals from the much more distant stations they are communicating with. The traffic would have to be extremely low for this to be workable.
|
Yes there is a drop in throughput but the robots only need 19.2 Kbps. Wireless can run up to 11Mbps. This means there can be almost a 99% drop and the robots would still work fine.