View Single Post
  #37   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-04-2008, 14:23
yongkimleng yongkimleng is offline
deus ex programmeur
AKA: James Yong
FTC #0747
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Singapore, West
Posts: 134
yongkimleng is a jewel in the roughyongkimleng is a jewel in the roughyongkimleng is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via MSN to yongkimleng
Re: Purchasing the 2009 controller

If I'm not mistaken, with the FPGA itself you can do quite a bit of fancy action-reaction or even PID loops

ADC / encoder -> FPGA ->PWM

How configurable the cRIO is I'm not sure, being here in Singapore the chances of getting my hands on a cRIO isn't very high. Yet.

Found a useful image here:


And here


One should offload most of the closed loop logic into the FPGA while the RTP handles monitoring, higher level processing, scheduling etc. Perhaps this explains why there are no support for interrupts. You don't need them! I think there is a certain level of paradigm shift from PIC based microcontroller programming to the cRIO observed here.

In my opinion, having an embedded computer in a ruggedized chassis at $1k is pretty decent. Apart from their development costs, one must remember that these are industrial grade equipment. Maybe within the range of other industrial PLD/CPLD devices.

On the sidenote, may want to consider thinking how many IFI processors, OI, etc which are already fried (dead), due to mistakes in connection such as polarity (oops!), high current surges, etc. I think the cRIO would be more reliable in this sense too.

Edit: I'm thinking of sampling a cRIO here in SG, and probably budget for it so that the kids here who were playing with vex can try out some new stuff, though I'm completely clueless how to go about doing that. Any non-FRC members have any idea?
__________________
| jamesyong.net |
FVC2007, FTC2008

Last edited by yongkimleng : 26-04-2008 at 14:41.
Reply With Quote