View Single Post
  #98   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-04-2008, 08:48
rick.oliver's Avatar
rick.oliver rick.oliver is offline
Mentor - Retired
AKA: Pap
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Liberty Township, OH
Posts: 244
rick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2008 IRI (Indiana Robotics Invitational)

Quote:
Originally Posted by rick.oliver View Post
Another possible solution: Apply the F.I.R.S.T. model with the following wrinkle. Have each of the eight alliances "nominte" a team to the loaner pool. If a team needs a spare, they may select any team from the loaner pool. They become a 4 team alliance as defined by the F.I.R.S.T. rules.
Having said this, having read the other testimonies and Chris' explanation, I prefer the method that IRI used last year. I think the strategy options are interesting and I like the ability to have a "broken" partner repair and re-enter the competition without having to go two on three. I understand the disappointment of not competing in the matches - I warmed the bench plenty when I played sports. We all need to learn how to contribute in what ever role we find ourselves assigned. Isn't that gracious professionalism?
Reply With Quote