View Single Post
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-05-2008, 16:39
qnetjoe qnetjoe is offline
Registered User
AKA: Joe Daily
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 51
qnetjoe is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to qnetjoe Send a message via MSN to qnetjoe Send a message via Yahoo to qnetjoe
Re: 2009 Control System Feature Wishlist

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhersh View Post
Sounds like a nice setup. Are you controlling a robot with it? I'm curious if there is actually any hardware interaction between the limit switches and the encoder inputs. If so, please describe it.

We just have a standard controller config. This controller everything from robotic arms to misc project robots. This can be anywhere from a mowing robot to a robot that just does our vending machines runs for us.

The limit switches just shut off the motor in a direction so we don't hurt our bots. More or less like a safety switch.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhersh View Post
Are there any specific sensors that you are most interested in?
Gyros, accelerometers, compass, ultrasonics, ir sensors, laser range finder,

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhersh View Post
Perhaps you mean something like this?
Exactly !!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhersh View Post
The NI-9505 is not capable of high enough current to run drive train motors and consumes a slot in the chassis for each motor. Probably not the best use of slot real estate.

Ah ha!... you were thinking of item number 5 above, eh?
I understandard that. I just think trying to integrate as much as possible on the cRIO would be the best bet for the long term. With regards to power, what about having a custom 9505 that has external power in?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhersh View Post
You and me both. It's very cool.
Does this mean that we may see the NI-1745 in the KOP?

Thanks for everything that you are doing!
Reply With Quote