View Single Post
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-05-2008, 08:08
kramarczyk's Avatar
kramarczyk kramarczyk is offline
is getting his kicks.
AKA: Mark Kramarczyk
FRC #3096 (Highlanders)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 602
kramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond reputekramarczyk has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Beam Bending Example

So from looking at the previous images I think we can safely conclude that
  1. Taking weight out of the sides of a beam is preferable to taking it out of the top and bottom (where load is applied is top).
  2. A taller beam carries a load with lower stress and deflection than a wider beam, so if you need to make 'it' stronger make it taller.

New images, just for squirrel
Quote:
Originally Posted by squirrel View Post
For the sake of making the discussion even more interesting, how about making several different shapes and sizes of beam, and applying the same (relatively small) load to them and showing them all? For example, you might have rectangular tubing with the load applied to the narrow side, and to the wide side, and round and square tubing, and an I beam, and a channel.
2" x 2" aluminum channel open to bottom
1/8" wall
1000 lbf uniform load
2.674 lbm
20318 psi max stress - Gee, why is that so much higher than the others?
.243 in max deflection
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Channel-Open Down-def.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	41.1 KB
ID:	6658  Click image for larger version

Name:	Channel-Open Down-stress.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	46.9 KB
ID:	6659  
__________________
Mark

Brick walls are for other people. - Randy Pausch