View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-06-2008, 20:19
Nikhil Bajaj Nikhil Bajaj is offline
MATLAB Fan
FRC #0461 (Westside Boiler Invasion)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: West Lafayette, Indiana
Posts: 101
Nikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond reputeNikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond reputeNikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond reputeNikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond reputeNikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond reputeNikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond reputeNikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond reputeNikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond reputeNikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond reputeNikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond reputeNikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Nikhil Bajaj
Re: pic: Latest Drivetain Assemby Render

Quote:
Originally Posted by roboticWanderor View Post
simplicity, serviceability, and weight. As it turns out, my dual cim gearbox, CIMs and all will weigh more than two single CIM gearboxes, negating the advantage of such a component.
Well, the advantage isn't completely negated. First of all, if you put two CIMs through one transmission you can usually make it so that you have less total gear/sprocket meshes and therefore less efficiency losses that way--which although small, start to stack up, especially with planetary transmissions. Plus, in shifting transmissions, it can help reduce the number of actuations required to shift (for example, two servos or pistons instead of four.) In that case, it could possibly still be a weight savings in terms of the overall system. But the way you're doing it could be better from a weight distribution perspective, too.

All that said, you're a total CAD champion in my book. Seriously, great work, really professional looking.

Last edited by Nikhil Bajaj : 14-06-2008 at 15:47.
Reply With Quote