|
Re: Actually-- less teams from last year..
Posted by Patrick Dingle at 1/6/2001 9:33 PM EST
Other on team #639, Red B^2, from Ithaca High School and Cornell University.
In Reply to: Actually-- less teams from last year..
Posted by colleen -- T190 on 1/6/2001 7:59 PM EST:
Wow... I just assumed that FIRST would have the same bracket setup as last year (8 alliances at regionals, 16 at nationals). 40 teams out of 350 or so.... that's about... 1 team for every 8.75 teams. That's not very many at all. 210 or so new teams. 8 less that go to finals. I think this is bad. All the other major sports leagues find it optimal to have between 25 and 50% of teams go to playoffs. Why is FIRST so much less?
I still like the idea of divisions, although I don't like so few teams from each division.
Patrick
: actually-- the way it will work out is that there will be LESS teams in the finals at both the regionals and nationals...
: 20 teams will move on at regionals as opposed to the 24
: 40 as opposed to 48 at nationals...
: we asked Eric about this.. and he said that for regionals.. increasing the number of teams making to finals (remember the need for factor of 5 etc..) would make the teams needed for the finals BIGGER than the number of teams at some regionals..
: as well, at both reg and Nats adding another round of finals would lose many qualifying matches per team.. this allows more playing time for all in qualifying..
: --colleen
__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.
|