View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-10-2008, 00:22
comphappy comphappy is offline
Registered User
AKA: Brennan Ashton
FRC #2605 (A2D_16)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 157
comphappy is a splendid one to beholdcomphappy is a splendid one to beholdcomphappy is a splendid one to beholdcomphappy is a splendid one to beholdcomphappy is a splendid one to beholdcomphappy is a splendid one to beholdcomphappy is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to comphappy
Re: OpenCV and New Control System

Quote:
Originally Posted by RyanCahoon View Post
I don't mean to discourage you if you really want to try it, but you're probably ahead to use the image processing framework included with LabVIEW. Trust me... LabVIEW really isn't the "easy way out" for programming.
No it really it not, from what I have been experimenting with for the last 3 months it has been the hard way to program robots. I am finding while signal processing will be a snap and perhaps the vision stuff as well. Effective drive code that may be oh 300 lines of straightforward C is turning into a convoluted mess of lines and VIs. Just creating a toggle variable (need a 1 and then 0 to do a ~) in C is a few simple lines, just try it in Labview it is a mess.

While I am training the rest of the underclassmen who are doing programming labview as it connected with the NXT and RXT stuff that they are already learning, I think I might just be writing this years code in C.

While I am amazed at what LabView can do (really I am), I am also shocked at what it does inefficiently.

CImg should run on the VxWorks stuff I would think, but I am waiting to see what comes out of WPI before I embark on that. We should know soon as the beta teams progress.
__________________
A2D Solving the Imaginary Error Function...
Reply With Quote