Thread: chassis isolation, contrary to UL1740?
View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-10-2008, 20:18
Richard Wallace's Avatar
Richard Wallace Richard Wallace is offline
I live for the details.
FRC #3620 (Average Joes)
Team Role: Engineer
  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Southwestern Michigan
Posts: 3,665
Richard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond repute
Re: chassis isolation, contrary to UL1740?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ Beavis View Post
I probably should have included the following disclaimer in my above post -

I don't write the rules. It's possible that FIRST and the GDC may decide to require non-conductive mounting of the cRIO to fully avoid the issue.

Russ
I would like to see a requirement for non-conductive mounting of the cRIO in the 2009 FRC rules -- but I don't write the rules, either.

Whatever the rule turns out to be, I hope that the rule makers will have it well thought out before January 3rd, 2009.
__________________
Richard Wallace

Mentor since 2011 for FRC 3620 Average Joes (St. Joseph, Michigan)
Mentor 2002-10 for FRC 931 Perpetual Chaos (St. Louis, Missouri)
since 2003

I believe in intuition and inspiration. Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution. It is, strictly speaking, a real factor in scientific research.
(Cosmic Religion : With Other Opinions and Aphorisms (1931) by Albert Einstein, p. 97)