Thread: cRio external 'co-processor' options
View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-10-2008, 23:32
EHaskins EHaskins is offline
Needs to change his user title.
AKA: Eric Haskins
no team (CARD #6 (SCOE))
Team Role: College Student
  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Elkhorn, WI USA
Posts: 998
EHaskins has a reputation beyond reputeEHaskins has a reputation beyond reputeEHaskins has a reputation beyond reputeEHaskins has a reputation beyond reputeEHaskins has a reputation beyond reputeEHaskins has a reputation beyond reputeEHaskins has a reputation beyond reputeEHaskins has a reputation beyond reputeEHaskins has a reputation beyond reputeEHaskins has a reputation beyond reputeEHaskins has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to EHaskins
Re: cRio external 'co-processor' options
Why are people concerned about not having a DHCP server? DHCP is not an integral part of the TCP/IP stack, and can be bypassed simply by configuring a static IP address. DHCP is only used to allow more flexibility in network topology.

My assumption would be that the cRio's access point NIC would be a DHCP client and the cRio's second NIC and the camera would have static, but configurable, IP addresses. Can any of the beta teams confirm this?
__________________
Eric Haskins KC9JVH