Thread: GM and Chrysler
View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-10-2008, 18:10
DarkFlame145 DarkFlame145 is offline
That guy
AKA: Dennis
no team (None this season)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 634
DarkFlame145 has much to be proud ofDarkFlame145 has much to be proud ofDarkFlame145 has much to be proud ofDarkFlame145 has much to be proud ofDarkFlame145 has much to be proud ofDarkFlame145 has much to be proud ofDarkFlame145 has much to be proud ofDarkFlame145 has much to be proud ofDarkFlame145 has much to be proud ofDarkFlame145 has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to DarkFlame145
Re: GM and Chrysler

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Hill View Post
I can't even believe the two are thinking about merging. On one hand, you have GM, a failing company, then on the other, Chrysler, another failing company.

Last time I checked, when 2 failing companies merge, they just end up forming 1 bigger failure of a company.

The talks of merging have to stop now.
In the auto world, buying and or selling brands is a good way to save a company. I mean when AMC (American Motor Company) went under Jeep (owned by AMC) was bought by Chrysler (maybe it was GM bought it, then sold it to Chrysler). Which for a while was very good for Chrysler cause for a while they sold more Jeeps then almost any other car they owned. Now buy companies can also be bad like the 90's then Ford bought Jag, Land Rover, and Volvo; Jag and Land Rover where spending more money then they where making. Which caused Ford to sell them for a fraction of what they bought them for. Sometimes the gamble pays off, other times it doesn't. I mean the 2 companies wont become one, they are just merging stocks (from what I understand). But if it doesn't work out I think Chrysler is done for, GM might be around, but badly hurt.
__________________
TR-X 145 of Norwich, NY: Student 2005-2008
Exploding Bacon 1902 of Winter Park, FL: Mentor 2009
US Navy Corpsman 2011-????
Reply With Quote