Thread: GM and Chrysler
View Single Post
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-10-2008, 11:05
ComradeNikolai ComradeNikolai is offline
Registered User
AKA: Nicholas
FRC #2603 (Team Hornet)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Medina, Ohio
Posts: 203
ComradeNikolai is a splendid one to beholdComradeNikolai is a splendid one to beholdComradeNikolai is a splendid one to beholdComradeNikolai is a splendid one to beholdComradeNikolai is a splendid one to beholdComradeNikolai is a splendid one to beholdComradeNikolai is a splendid one to behold
Re: GM and Chrysler

I hate to see this happen because it will inevitably result in some losses; however, what's the alternative? If they DON'T merge, is it possible that they could both independently fail, resulting in ALL loss of sponsorship?* It seems unlikely that they would merge unless it was absolutely necessary. I just hope that all the teams fare well, get funding, and retain mentors.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Hill View Post
Well, unions ARE a huge part of why the auto industry is failing. [...] Unions inherently create an inefficiency in the workforce. If some new guy starts on the factory line, wants to impress his boss, so he works extra hard and pumps out a few more units than most others, he WILL be approached by other union workers and tell him to cut it out.
I guess that's the price we pay for unions, but without unions, we'd be far worse off. It's not guaranteed that it would be the same, but the industrial revolution is evidence of what bad comes from unions. Sure, we would possibly have a more successful industry without unions, but we may have less mentors due to an increased necessity to work and less compensation for said work.

*that's a genuine question: I haven't researched it.
__________________
I cut myself shaving with Occam's razor.

Reply With Quote