View Single Post
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-10-2008, 19:46
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,807
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Interesting Newsletter from NI

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thermal View Post
You fail to realize that hundreds of teams are lacking in money due to pulled sponsorships with this economy, and functional ROV's are easily, EASILY anywhere from 3 to 10 times more expensive than our normal land bots.

No team can afford to build an ROV of this kind of size (28" x 38"). If they were to decrease the robot dimensions to make this sort of game feasible i'd consider it an extreme step down for FIRST.

Also correct me if i'm wrong, but wouldn't the bots have to be tethered? I'm not sure how well radio signals travel through something like water. I think the higher the frequency the worse it travels through water, so we'd have to be on some super low frequency channels to play with an untethered bot. I'm not sure there is enough bandwith to control a robot at those frequencies.
You might want to talk to team 842 about the technicalities of building an ROV for competition. They run an underwater robotics event. More details at www.h2orobots.org ...
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Reply With Quote