|
Re: New Info on 2009 control system, maybe
Quote:
Originally Posted by willson.thomas
I think the best implementation would be to simply disable the robot if a joystick is disconnected, and to also require a power cycle to re-enable the robot. This would make sure that no bad data/timing error caused by the disable would make the robot behave erratically.
|
Problematic and probably overkill. How do you implement default code that doesn't need to be changed to run a robot if missing a joystick means the robot won't run? Plus, disabling the whole robot when a joystick read fails probably takes more work.
__________________
The difficult we do today; the impossible we do tomorrow. Miracles by appointment only.
Lone Star Regional Troubleshooter
|