Thread: Not a problem with scouting
View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 23:49
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: "universal terms" - Thinking Backwards
Posted by Dodd Stacy at 1/30/2001 12:00 PM EST


Engineer on team #95, Lebanon Robotics Team, from Lebanon High School and CRREL/CREARE.


In Reply to: Re: "universal terms"
Posted by Mike Soukup on 1/30/2001 10:25 AM EST:



: This brings to mind one of my favorite phrases: "The great thing about standards is there's so many." There will be a lot of teams (or groups of teams) trying to push their own universal terms.

: Mike

I suggest starting with a plain english list of machine functional capabilities or tactical gambits. There is very little in such a list to argue about, and it would highlight how many "universal terms" need adopting by the community. This approach would head off the tendency to immediately start arguing over specific "terms" and grinding a worthwhile effort to a halt.

Then, specific "term" ideas could be viewed and judged in the larger strategic context. I just think it would be easier for a larger community to buy in if we could see in one place everything needed to efficiently communicate and form an alliance strategy in 2 minutes.

Dodd


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.