Thread: Commercial Hardware
View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 00:00
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Consider the following...
Posted by Joe Johnson at 2/2/2001 3:55 PM EST


Engineer on team #47, Chief Delphi, from Pontiac Central High School and Delphi Automotive Systems.


In Reply to: Re: Too Legalistic in some cases
Posted by Gary Bonner on 2/2/2001 12:36 PM EST:



In regard to Q&A74, honestly, I don't know what to make of this rule.

If absolute "equal access to certain parts in terms of selection and lead time" is the standard, what am I to do with left over Small Parts Inc. stock from last year?

For example, must I throw out chain that I purchased from SPI last year but went unused because it would give me a theoretical advantage "in terms of both selections and lead time"?

I am a reasonable person with a reasonably well formed conscience, but I can't see the reasonableness of a strict enforcement of this rule.

Again I ask, Too Legalistic or Too Cavalier?

What is a person to do?

Joe J.


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.