View Single Post
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-12-2008, 14:12
Daniel_LaFleur's Avatar
Daniel_LaFleur Daniel_LaFleur is offline
Mad Scientist
AKA: Me
FRC #2040 (DERT)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 1,959
Daniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Daniel_LaFleur
Re: Best way to detect a bot

Quote:
Originally Posted by dpeterson3 View Post
The electroscope is designed to sense changes in the electric field around the object. If a robot got closer, the field would change, right?
While that circuit will detect changes in the EM field, it may not do what you want.

First, the number of windings in the antenna, length of the antenna, and the values of the RC circuit (coupling) behind the antenna will affect the efficiency of the antenna and center frequency.

The other issue you'll face is filtering out the changing EM from your own machine. Your motors (Being closer to your antenna than any other robots motors) will greatly affect (possibly even completely washout) your ability to see another robots EM field.
__________________
___________________
"We are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts, Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. "
- Tennyson, Ulysses