Thread: thoughts on the finals
View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 00:13
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Sounds about right
Posted by Chris Hibner at 2/5/2001 4:34 PM EST


Coach on team #308, Walled Lake Monster, from Walled Lake Schools and TRW Automotive Electronics.


In Reply to: You first please...
Posted by Joe Johnson on 2/4/2001 7:28 PM EST:




: What would teams think of this proposal (assuming the
: rules don't spell it out yet):

: Re-rank all the alliances that make it through the
: quarter finals (a.k.a. the group champions) based on
: their highest score in the quarter finals. Then have
: Seed #1 play Seed #4 and Seed #2 play Seed #3. Have
: the higher ranked team go first in the semi-finals. In
: the Finals, have the alliance that scored highest in
: the Semi-Finals go first.

: What do you think?

: Joe J.


I think this is probably the best way to do it. I'm pretty sure they'll end up doing this.


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.