Thread: Two questions about keeping it in the footprint
View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2009, 10:41
Petey's Avatar
Petey Petey is offline
Strategy & Gaming
AKA: Chris Peterson
None #1073 (Team F.O.R.C.E.)
Team Role: Alumni
  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Hollis-Brookline, NH
Posts: 644
Petey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Two questions about keeping it in the footprint
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1075guy View Post
You definitely COULD NOT have a 30x30 robot (it wouldn't fit in the 28" dimension).
doh

edited
Quote:
Also, it must not ever extend outside of the 28x38x60 box, as at any time during the MATCH, the ROBOT is decidedly in some PLAYING CONFIGURATION. A ROBOT can have many PLAYING CONFIGURATIONs, but no one of them can extend beyond the 28x38x60 boundary.
Yeah i figured that was the reading but I wasn't sure because of the use of "assume" which implies a transitive state that exists between SC and PC.
__________________

Bio:
Team 1073 alumnus, now Admissions Officer at MIT.

Thanks to all those who have helped me through FIRST over the years.