View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-01-2009, 11:09
Kevin Sevcik's Avatar
Kevin Sevcik Kevin Sevcik is offline
(Insert witty comment here)
FRC #0057 (The Leopards)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,673
Kevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Sevcik Send a message via Yahoo to Kevin Sevcik
Re: Hole in the rules regarding causing penalties?

This seems entirely similar to the rule for herding/holding ringers in 2007. In that case, robots were only allowed to herd/possess one ringer at a time. If an additional ringer inadvertently fell on the robot, the were allowed to dispose of the original ringer, but had to remove the additional afterwards before possessing another. Also, it was not allowed to intentionally place an additional ringer on a robot to penalize or restrict them, and such ringers were ignored.

I imagine the GDC will go with a similar ruling here. At worst, an empty cell that accidentally bounces onto an inaccessible place on your robot will mean you can't pursue any more empty cells. So I don't think sandbagging opponents with empty cells is going to be viable once this is brought to the GDC's attention.
__________________
The difficult we do today; the impossible we do tomorrow. Miracles by appointment only.

Lone Star Regional Troubleshooter