View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-01-2009, 13:40
Petey's Avatar
Petey Petey is offline
Strategy & Gaming
AKA: Chris Peterson
None #1073 (Team F.O.R.C.E.)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Hollis-Brookline, NH
Posts: 644
Petey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond reputePetey has a reputation beyond repute
Re: BUMPER PERIMETER

Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryVoshol View Post
Teams need to be very careful about how they design their frames. If you have concave sections of the frame, you cannot attach bumpers to that section.
I saw this rule but I did not read this as a cannot. I just read it as a permissive rule--i.e., you can avoid putting bumpers on up to 1/3rd of your bot.

Suppose you had a chassis like this:



Are you saying that you cannot put bumpers on the inside (i.e. the concave) part of the chassis?

Or (and I do apologize for the crudeness of my drawings here),


You're saying that the bumpers in green are legal and the bumpers in red are illegal? Because the way I had read the rule was that the bumpers in green were necessary and legal but the bumpers in red were superfluous but legal.

Or am I misreading you entirely and you're simply making sure that teams know they need to protect 2/3rds NOT of the outside of their robot, but rather 2/3rds of the imaginary line described by the vertices of their robot?
__________________

Bio:
Team 1073 alumnus, now Admissions Officer at MIT.

Thanks to all those who have helped me through FIRST over the years.

Last edited by Petey : 06-01-2009 at 13:43.