Thread: Conveyor Belt
View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2009, 13:03
Kevin Sevcik's Avatar
Kevin Sevcik Kevin Sevcik is offline
(Insert witty comment here)
FRC #0057 (The Leopards)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,624
Kevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Sevcik Send a message via Yahoo to Kevin Sevcik
Re: Conveyor Belt

Quote:
Originally Posted by Otaku View Post
I'm sure there's a number of ways you could do it, but the easiest to do (probably) would be just "standard" treadmill/conveyer belt material... I don't know what it's called but it's almost always the same kinda stuff -- this black cloth/hard rubber material covered in tiny divots for traction.
Actual conveyor belting is a bad idea. It's a flat belt, so it's much more difficult to get it to ride true than a round belt or V-belt or something. You'll need crowned pulleys to have reasonable odds of keeping it on, but that's dependent on how well aligned the pulleys are. If they're too far our of parallel with each other, the belt is inevitably going to walk to one side or another. They're just generally harder to get working than the round urethane belting. Which is why you see so many teams running the urethane belts.
__________________
The difficult we do today; the impossible we do tomorrow. Miracles by appointment only.

Lone Star Regional Troubleshooter