Thread: Conveyor Belt
View Single Post
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2009, 13:11
Richard Wallace's Avatar
Richard Wallace Richard Wallace is offline
I live for the details.
FRC #3620 (Average Joes)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Southwestern Michigan
Posts: 3,646
Richard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Conveyor Belt

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Sevcik View Post
Actual conveyor belting is a bad idea. It's a flat belt, so it's much more difficult to get it to ride true than a round belt or V-belt or something. You'll need crowned pulleys to have reasonable odds of keeping it on, but that's dependent on how well aligned the pulleys are. If they're too far our of parallel with each other, the belt is inevitably going to walk to one side or another. They're just generally harder to get working than the round urethane belting. Which is why you see so many teams running the urethane belts.
My team's experience in 2006 supports what Kevin said above. We had a sponsor that donated materials for a flat belt system to elevate Poof balls to our shooter. The elevator worked well, except when it got out of alignment, lost tension, or slipped a belt. It did those things often enough to make our shooter ineffective in many matches.

I recommend using solid round conveyor belting.
__________________
Richard Wallace

Mentor since 2011 for FRC 3620 Average Joes (St. Joseph, Michigan)
Mentor 2002-10 for FRC 931 Perpetual Chaos (St. Louis, Missouri)
since 2003

I believe in intuition and inspiration. Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution. It is, strictly speaking, a real factor in scientific research.
(Cosmic Religion : With Other Opinions and Aphorisms (1931) by Albert Einstein, p. 97)