View Single Post
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2009, 23:20
Ian Curtis Ian Curtis is offline
Best Available Data
FRC #1778 (Chill Out!)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 2,520
Ian Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Cover on the airlock area?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pfreivald View Post
That's tremendously strange. I was pouring over both pictures and CAD drawings trying to find out the answer to this very question. With no top to the airlock, what is the point of the lower, harder-to-use little windows?

I don't really get it, and that has made me worried that I'm missing something. I plan to ask on the Q&A, just to double-triple check this.

Patrick
I imagine its purpose is threefold:

1. As Ironstorm has already pointed out, it protects human fingers from being squished, especially in a year where robot controllability is at all time low.

2. It takes away the 90 degree corners in the field, making it less likely that robots will be jack knifed in a corner unable to get out, and making it harder for robots to corner each other.

3. It makes the challenge of designing a delivery mechanism more interesting.
__________________
CHILL OUT! | Aero Stability & Control Engineer
Adam Savage's Obsessions (TED Talk) (Part 2)
It is much easier to call someone else a genius than admit to yourself that you are lazy. - Dave Gingery