View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2009, 18:25
eugenebrooks eugenebrooks is offline
Team Role: Engineer
AKA: Dr. Brooks
no team (WRRF)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 601
eugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond reputeeugenebrooks has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Detecting wheel slippage! Possible idea, amp/power feedback in Jaguars.

One way to detect wheel slippage is to place a lightly loaded (so you don't take much normal force away from the driven wheel) free wheel near the driven wheel of interest and compare the rotational speed. You back off the power when the driven wheel slips too much, and as a result you should get good traction. The rub here is that it does take an extra wheel and sensor, and it could be the case that unlike rubber wheels on pavement, any slip is too much slip.

A second way, as you note, is to measure motor current. The torque delivered by the motor is proportional to the current. If you measure and report the current to the driver the joystick settings can be tweaked to maximize current, and therefore traction. The rub here is that the current is pulsed via the pwm signal, challenging accurate average current measurement.

A third way is to directly measure the acceleration of the robot, linear or rotational as desired, and bring this signal back to the driver. The driver can tune the throttles with this feedback, staying on top of the maximum acceleration point when desired. The rub here is making the measurement with good accuracy. The available acceleration sensors are set up to measure more than one G full scale while your maximum might be closer to +-1/10 of a G. You have to carefully watch the quantization error in the cRIO in this case.

I tend to favor the third method above, because it directly measures the performance metric of interest, without time averaging. I also tend to favor systems that provide good feedback to the driver, instead of trying to control the wheel torque automatically, as it will lead to well trained drivers that should get the most out of the robot.

Eugene
Reply With Quote