View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-01-2009, 20:16
XaulZan11's Avatar
XaulZan11 XaulZan11 is online now
Registered User
AKA: John Christiansen
FRC #1732
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milwaukee, Wi
Posts: 1,329
XaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to XaulZan11
Re: A statistical look at G14

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery View Post
The difference here is that the NFL would have previous years' games to look at, FIRST doesn't.

We can't afford to go with "let's look at Week 1" method, because doing so is essentially screwing over week 1. We need to fix the problem BEFORE the competitions begin, rather than tell all teams competing in week 1 that they are just the test subjects.
And the best and closest examples we have, while not exactly the same, are previous years' games.
Maybe I don't understand the purpose of this data. What problem are we fixing? (I sure hope your not using this data as proof that G14 is a bad rule and shouldn't be used).

I do agree with you and Bongle that this is the best data we have, but it simply isn't good enough to make any conclusive statements.