View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-01-2009, 20:20
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is offline
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,634
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: A statistical look at G14

Quote:
Originally Posted by XaulZan11 View Post
Maybe I don't understand the purpose of this data. What problem are we fixing? (I sure hope your not using this data as proof that G14 is a bad rule and shouldn't be used).

I do agree with you and Bongle that this is the best data we have, but it simply isn't good enough to make any conclusive statements.
This data isn't the proof, the proof is the fact that G14 penalizes teams who have done nothing wrong. Why should my team be penalized for the actions of my alliance partner the match before?


This shows the upper bound of the scale of this problem.

<G14> is, by far, the single worst rule written since I've been involved with FIRST. There is no justification for this abomination of a rule.
__________________
Being correct doesn't mean you don't have to explain yourself.