Thread: <R06>
View Single Post
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2009, 11:43
Jared Russell's Avatar
Jared Russell Jared Russell is offline
Taking a year (mostly) off
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs), FRC #0341 (Miss Daisy)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,078
Jared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond repute
Re: <R06>

Quote:
Originally Posted by hdanak View Post
I don't quite understand the big deal about making the robot heavier... while an increased normal force may improve traction, it won't help accelerating and braking-- if your robot is heavier, it is that much harder to accelerate. I suppose the only advantage is if another robot were to push you, then it would take a larger force to break static friction. I think that the only reason it seems to improve acceleration is that it slows down the motor speed, bringing it below the threshold of breaking static friction (g*u_s). On the other hand, using idler wheels for the purpose of getting robot motion data may waste the weight that it would have driven otherwise... the other wheels must still pull that load.

Hike Danakian, Reseda Regents Robotics (2584)
Increasing robot mass increases the percentage of the robot/trailer system that is applying power to the floor, thereby increasing maximum acceleration and deceleration.

In other words:

F = u*N = u*m*g
F = m*a

The "m" in the top line does not include the mass of the trailer.
The "m" in the second line does

Last edited by Jared Russell : 20-01-2009 at 13:25.