View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2009, 17:25
XaulZan11's Avatar
XaulZan11 XaulZan11 is offline
Registered User
AKA: John Christiansen
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milwaukee, Wi
Posts: 1,326
XaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to XaulZan11
Re: NASA should broadcast matches

[quote=EricH;805385]

I can answer those questions, somewhat. In answer to the first one, all day, two straight days. Who would display us? Discovery? Yeah, right. FOX Sports? Doubt it. ESPN? They'll say, we tried already. The only stations that would show us for that kind of time are sports stations, and we aren't a sport (in some estimations), or there are other sports wanting the time.

QUOTE]

Yeah, I don't think tv is the answer. People are increasingly watching tv online. Also, its not like FIRST is geared toward the population that are still learning how to use email. I think FIRST's target would certianly 'get' the webcast.

While the quality has to be good and a professional looking site/player, I don't think the video itself has to be changed too much from the current webcast. I think you could have the couple minutes of break inbetween matches. On tv this wouldn't work, but on a webcast I think its acceptable.
Reply With Quote