Thread: High Score??
View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 01:06
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: High Score??
Posted by Katie Storch at 2/20/2001 4:43 PM EST


Student on team #86, Resistance, from Stanton College Prep and Vistakon.


In Reply to: Re: High Score??
Posted by Josh Vetter on 2/19/2001 11:51 PM EST:



We've spent a lot of time testing.. but no one has thought to even try balancing a big ball on top. We could probably do it if we don't drive too crazily.

But if you have a reasonable amount of balls in the goals.. which you can have your human players fill, then you're good to go. Ten balls in one goal with both goals on the bridge is worth 10 points.. and a x4 multiplier. That takes care of a big ball..

And.. two big balls on the goal on the bridge is actually worth 80 points... 10 per big ball and x2 per balanced goal. So, I do see your point. It does work for points.. but so do small balls without having to have a robot designed to deal with those balls.

And I believe the initial question was.. were the top teams going to be there because of a 1.1 multiplier? And I still think that they won't be.


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.