View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 01:16
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: =========STRATEGY PROBLEM #3==========

Posted by Chris Orimoto at 02/24/2001 3:33 AM EST


Student on team #368, Kika Mana, from McKinley High School and Nasa Ames/Hawaiian Electric/Weinberg Foundation.


In Reply to: =========STRATEGY PROBLEM #3==========
Posted by Anton Abaya on 02/22/2001 2:59 PM EST:



Again...exact same strategy. This time, put D on the stretcher.

C goes straight for limbo to grab big ball while A grabs D on the stretcher. B pushes goal back to alliance station.
A pulls stretcher over bridge first. B pushes ramp down, goes over and hangs around by ramp. After all this time has passed, C should be ready to cross over bridge again w/big ball. C crosses over and B (being on the far side) pushes ramp back down to far side and then heads for a big ball. While C is dumping big ball into near goal, A should have dropped off the stretcher and hooked onto the far goal. (B had pushed the bridge to the far side) A then comes over the bridge back to the near side. During this transition, C should have deposited the big ball and headed for the limbo to endzone. A grabs the two goals and takes time to balance...enough time, in fact for B to grab a big ball and position it to be placed on the "far" goal after it is balanced.

This is a little different from the previous two scenarios, but it works. Being a little more complex, I think the 450 score is more likely here.

10+10+10+10+10+10+15=75
75*4=300
300*1.5=450

I do think though, that this is very accomplishable in 1:45.

Just my personal thoughts...

Chris, #368
__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.