Thread: =========STRATEGY PROBLEM #4==========
View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 01:17
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: =========STRATEGY PROBLEM #4==========
Posted by Chris Orimoto at 02/24/2001 3:45 AM EST


Student on team #368, Kika Mana, from McKinley High School and Nasa Ames/Hawaiian Electric/Weinberg Foundation.


In Reply to: =========STRATEGY PROBLEM #4==========
Posted by Anton Abaya on 02/22/2001 3:04 PM EST:



Sorry if my posts are getting repetitive, but I do think that this situation also calls for a similar strategy...I shall assume that big ball grabbers can also push the bridge down. This time A is on the stretcher.

C takes the first initial sprint over the bridge to grab a big ball. While this happens, B hooks onto the stretcher, goes to bridge, pushes bridge down and goes over. D is pushing near goal to alliance station. After B passes over the bridge, C would probably be ready to come back. C comes back and places big ball on near goal (which should be full). D limbos and heads for far goal. After dropping off the stretcher, B loads a big ball into the far goal, which is to be dragged by D. By the time this is done, C should have already crossed BACK over the bridge and into the endzone. D then takes far goal, grabs near goal and balances.

The assumption here is that, since D is "MADE" to be a hook-balancing robot, it should have the best balancing capabilities. If not, then B can do the balancing, but its "arm" would suggest that its slower, although that does not HAVE to be the case.

10+10+10+10+10+10+15=75
75*4=300

If done in under 1:30, then
300*2=600
If done in under 1:45, then
300*1.5=450

Just my personal thoughts...

Chris, #368
__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.