View Single Post
  #45   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-01-2009, 07:39
GaryVoshol's Avatar
GaryVoshol GaryVoshol is offline
Cogito ergo arbitro
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 5,744
GaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: <G14> - ya win some, ya lose some

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Steele View Post
I would like for someone to show me where this has ever happened before..
All three robots for an alliance not showing up...
Not in a competition match, but I recall practice day at the Detroit Regional, Rack-n-Roll. No robot showed up for one of the alliances - and they won anyway, 2-0! (One of the HP's flung a ringer onto the rack.)

I don't think KK needs to have any worry about a significant loss of corporate profits from Dave's wager.

Back to Hawk's mathematical argument, the wording of <G14> is "more than twice" and "more than triple" the opponent's score. Given a wierd fluke that a team manages to defy all odds and does score zero, the other alliance's non-zero score is clearly "more than triple" that zero. Three times zero is zero.

I've been trying to figure how low the lowest scores will be. I too am convinced that most teams will be able to sink at least one or two balls by their PS at the beginning of the match. Add in another couple of lucky shots later in the match, and even an alliance with three robots that can't score should still get a minimum of 10 points.
__________________
(since 2004)