View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-01-2009, 10:20
ScottOliveira ScottOliveira is offline
Registered User
FRC #3455 (Carpe Robotum)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: McLean, VA
Posts: 133
ScottOliveira is just really niceScottOliveira is just really niceScottOliveira is just really niceScottOliveira is just really niceScottOliveira is just really nice
Re: <R06> normal wear and tear

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post

With regards to the intent of the rule, it says it in the rule, therefore it is either a) part of the rule or b) an explanatory note. If it is an explanatory note, then you may still want to pay attention. What part of a Supreme Court ruling gets the most attention? It's not the ruling itself, it's the reasons for the ruling.
That is highly debatable. A lot of people don't care much about the explanation, only whether their side won or not. And people tend to forget the explanation, and only remember the actual ruling in the long run. Reasons are important primarily for people who have to use those rulings to make other decisions (lawyers, judges, politicians), as opposed to everyday people.