View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-02-2009, 01:24
zrop zrop is offline
Registered User
FRC #2526
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Posts: 61
zrop has a spectacular aura aboutzrop has a spectacular aura aboutzrop has a spectacular aura about
Re: For those who are skeptical about propellers - Team 2526

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
12.25 inches????

Let's run the numbers. That's 374.15 feet per second if something breaks! If a prop breaks, it's going 7, yes 7, FRC fields per second.

As for perfectly safe if they don't exceed maximum RPM, that's all well and good, but R/C aircraft don't hit things. That's the facts of it--if they hit anything, they crash (or just crashed) and the prop is broken anyway. These props are going to be jostled through shock loads when they get hit. This could potentially weaken them. If they're weak, and they get one hit too many, somebody is going to get hit, hard. I haven't run the numbers on KE for, say, 1/3 of a prop, but that's far more than I want to have hitting anybody!

As for who's going to poke hands in, I can think of a few things--little kids, poles from a tipped trailer, unsuspecting students... I am pretty sure I could get my hand in enough to contact at least one prop.

Bottom line, don't worry about keeping balls out, worry about keeping the props in. If you do that (better than the cage shown will), the balls will take care of themselves.

Oh, and I just remembered--if you reverse those blades while they're going full bore, that's a pretty hefty acceleration force you put them through. This will contribute to propeller weakening. They aren't designed to run in reverse.
How about this: We'll put extra thick mesh on the sides of the safety cage because any flying props would.. exit there. But to keep proper airflow, the current cage in the front and back should suffice.