Thread: Renumbering of rules in rev F and Rev G of section 8
View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-02-2009, 21:46
skidmarks skidmarks is offline
Registered User
FRC #0957 (WATSON)
Team Role: Programmer
  
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Albany, Oregon
Posts: 19
skidmarks is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Renumbering of rules in rev F and Rev G of section 8
I noticed the Rev. E <R65> <R66> <R67> <R66> <R67> <R68> <R69> <R70> problem, but I figured someone else noticed it. I agree that it should have been changed using .1 and .2 to differentiate it rather than silently changing all the following numbers. Hope confusion doesn't ensue.