Thread: Sticking Ramps and Fat Goals!
View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 01:47
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Sticking Ramps and Fat Goals!
Posted by Clinton Hamilton at 03/06/2001 10:38 AM EST


Student on team #108, SigmaC@T, from Dillard High School and Motorola.


In Reply to: Re: Sticking Ramps and Fat Goals!
Posted by Jason Rudolph on 03/05/2001 10:17 AM EST:



The bridge at KSC also seemed to favor the right
side (as seen by main stands) of the field. If it
wasn't pushed COMPLETELY down to the ground
on the left there would be a small gap between the
lip of the bridge and the ground and the bridge was
easy to bump into a balanced position so long as it
was unloaded.
Of course I was never actually on the field to fool
with it so it may have been the heat induced
hallucinations.


: Well, at KSC, the ramp did seem to stick much
more, so I guess it was built the same way. As for
the goals, it seemed to be the same as the stuff
we used to build ours.

: Jason


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.