Thread: Camera tracking at 110ms
View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-02-2009, 09:10
Greg McKaskle Greg McKaskle is offline
Registered User
FRC #2468 (Team NI & Appreciate)
  
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,751
Greg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Camera tracking at 110ms
I've done the LV timings hundreds of times. 640x480 is around 5fps, 320x240 is around 10fps, and 160x120 is around 25fps. If you decimate some, you can improve it further.

You can definitely get 110ms or better. What are your other constraints?

Greg McKaskle