Thread: Turning Radius
View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-02-2009, 11:24
Rick TYler Rick TYler is offline
A VEX GUy WIth A STicky SHift KEy
VRC #0010 (Exothermic Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Redmond, Washington
Posts: 2,000
Rick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Turning Radius

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz View Post
In cases where the robot is stationary but turning, the minimum would be the turning radius but I think it still would be affected by the trailer hitting the back of the robot.
I loved Al's last comment so much that I think it should be spotlighted. We have these conversations all the time: "Here's the incredibly complex calculation of how the system would work based on physics and mathematics, but the noise level is so high (or the real world will intrude in imperfect ways, like a trailer hitting a robot) that we are going to take that 27.3991 mm calculation and just turn it into 'a big old hunk of 2-inch square tubing.'"

And this, my Padawan robot builders, is also engineering.

On the original question, doing the velocity, thrust, friction, and slip-angle math for describing turning radii at different speeds is well beyond the ability of my rusty math. Sorry.
__________________
Exothermic Robotics Club, Venturing Crew 2036
VRC 10A, 10B, 10D, 10Q, 10V, 10X, 10Z, and 575