Thread: HIGH SCORE????
View Single Post
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 01:56
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Not a mistake

Posted by Fred Agnir at 03/08/2001 8:58 AM EST


Coach on team #126, Gael Force, from Clinton HS and Nypro Inc..


In Reply to: Gladly!
Posted by P.J. Baker on 03/07/2001 9:31 PM EST:




: The exact same play was run in all 4 mathces. In the 1st round, the balance occured a little late, and 177 took a bit too long to drop the big ball, so we were kindly asked to head for the endzone w/o scoring (BTW - this was a mistake because the 10 pts for the big ball and the 10 pts for the Bobcat in the endzone are interchangeable).


The decision to send Team 177 into the endzone rather than score the ball was based on time and pressure. In an earlier round, team 125 scrambling to put the ball on top rather than head to the endzone with what time they had left inadvertently toppled the goals and ramp. This reduced a potential score of 370's down to 40's. We did not want to start with a 40. We were looking for a safe 400. So, in our early strategy discussion, it was agreed that if Team 126 wasn't balanced at 1:15, then Team 177 would go to the endzone rather than scramble for the ball on the goal.


Regards,

Fred Agnir


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.