Thread: Three suggestions for FIRST
View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 02:03
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Three suggestions for FIRST + 1 more
Posted by Janna at 03/11/2001 10:04 PM EST


Student on team #349, The RoBahamas, from International Academy and Ford Motor Company and Robert Bosch GmbH.


In Reply to: Re: Three suggestions for FIRST + 1 more
Posted by nick237 on 03/10/2001 8:29 PM EST:



I definitely agree with you, Nick!

We just came from West Michigan, where we were in the match sets starting with 58, 64, 70, and 76. As soon as we got back to the pit we only had time to tether our robot and put it back in starting position before we were called again. We ended up getting there after all the other teams had gotten there and had to deal with whatever strategy they threw at us. Also, our drivers were forced to be easy on the robot because we had absolutely no repair time.

Last year at Great Lakes our matches were always at least a half an hour apart, and we had 9 of them at West Michigan. I'd settle for a few less matches and more time in between.

Janna

__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.