Quote:
Originally Posted by Theodore Huff
The navigation, while helpful and noticeable, is semi-limited. When I first checked it out, I navigated to a subpage and had then scrolled over another header link only to find that my sub links were changed as well. It would be nice to be able to move within the same category, if they are always displayed.
I also think your visual style, while everyone loves black, should return to the lighter overall colors you had before. It would look so much better if there was even some sort of gold graphic in the back ground. For a team that stands out at competitions as being bright as the sun, I want to see their website reflect that. Also, don't forget that CAT doesn't want their logo within some unreasonable amount of pixels to other logos. Do what We and Harrison did, just write the name in Impact and change the spacing to about -25. Should look close enough for recognition, but not be the real deal. Our Cat representative said that it was alright.
I think you guys have a great chance for website award based on your content, but I think that a good number of parents judging it may not like the overall appearance and flow.
|
I agree that the black background does take some getting used to. However, it is too late to really change that for this season. Part of our problem was that our graphics designer never showed up. Also, I don't see what the problem with the menu is. Javascript menus, such as yours do not keep the drop downs there either. Also, from a workshop about two years ago.. "no information should take more than three clicks to get to." With the current system, it is unnecessary to click on the main tab to get to information. Otherwise, it would either be necessary to click on a tab twice to access the primary tab's page, or it would be necessary to visit that page in order to access any information under that tab. In either case, that is a bad navigation decision. At this point, as far as I can tell, all or at least most of the information which is available can be accessed in three clicks (without using the site map, since that's cheating).
Also, it is worth noting that content was actually a focus this year, as there was content dating back to 2007 which had not yet been added (e.g. 2007 Championship), and there close to nothing about 2008. To be specific, there was nothing about any competitions that we went to except a news article about Boilermaker. The 2008 team history never got fully written last year. Also, FTC and FLL information had not been updated for quite some time (game listed on FTC was the pilot year and FLL was Nano Quest). The awards page did not have anything about 2008 awards, so pictures had to be take and put up, and the sponsor listing was from 2007. As you (hopefully) know, content makes up 50% of the website score.