View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2009, 21:57
Tristan Lall's Avatar
Tristan Lall Tristan Lall is offline
Registered User
FRC #0188 (Woburn Robotics)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 2,484
Tristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond repute
Re: CIM motor with AM planetary

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel_LaFleur View Post
Whenever you take something apart and put it back together it will always be a little different.

The rule does not say functionally the same, it says modify.

Thus I suggest Q&A ... and I'll almost be willing to bet they'd say that a motor that was disassembled and then reassembled will be considered modified.
Your reasoning is sound, but I'd like to point out that FIRST feels that disassembling a custom assembly into COTS parts is (generally) sufficient to restore their COTS status (i.e. they are considered "unmodified"). Does that process work in reverse?