View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 02:45
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
I have big ball match stats........

Posted by Jessica Boucher at 03/24/2001 10:01 PM EST


Student on team #237, Sie-H2O-Bots, from Watertown High School and Eastern Awning Systems & The Siemon Company.


In Reply to: Does anyone have stats about robots falling over?
Posted by bill whitley on 03/24/2001 8:18 PM EST:



......that need to be recalculated because of the new regional data, but before this last grouping of regionals, the stats were.......

*All these stats apply to are non-finals matches where a big ball was sucessfully scored*

National average score: 136.23, where anything over 400 is considered an outlier (st. dev of 104.9, if you know what Im talking about)

National average time remaining: .2949 seconds, where anything over a minute is an outlier (st. dev of .254)

Averages, broken up by regionals:

Note: mean score is the first number, one in paranthesis is the st. dev (for those who care)

VCU: Score - 83.3 (40) Time - .29 (.32)
LI: Score - 112.4 (50) Time - .50 (.33)
West Mich: Score - 171.89 (146) Time - .18 (.14)
Lone Star: Score - 130.6 (92) Time - .30 (.26)
NYC: Score - 84.5 (53) Time - .38 (.27)
J&J: Score - 178.8 (141) Time - .27 (.21)
SoCal: Score - 128.7 (79) Time - .8 (.21)
UTC: Score - 143.3 (101) Time - .30 (.23)
KSC: Score - 127.6 (79) Time - .23 (.19)

Disclaimer: I am merely a Statistics student testing what I've learned, so if I'm wrong, dont flame me too bad

More to come later, including the re-calculated averages.

-Jessica B, #237


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.