Thread: Taking risks @ Nat's: Will your team do it?
View Single Post
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 02:49
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 60% of matches at GL were < 100 points
Posted by Kevin at 03/26/2001 4:13 PM EST


Coach on team #308, Walled Lake Monsters, from Walled Lake Schools and TRW Automotive Electronics.


In Reply to: 60% of matches at GL were
Posted by Matt Berube on 03/26/2001 2:35 PM EST:



: I have absolutely no problem with teams like the Tecnocats, the CheesyPoofs, the KnightRiders and many of the other teams who have posted here going for a 2 goal balance in the qualifing matchs. You have all proven you cn do this sucessfully.

: But why is it that 60% of the Great Lakes qualifing matches were less than 100 points? I think it is because the wrong teams tried too much. Almost all of these could have been over 200 point matches with a more conservative strategy.

: (OK, I'll shut up now)

: Matt B.
: T49
: &quot;Daydreaming in left field&quot;

60% of matches at GL were
__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.