View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 02:51
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
More interesting numbers...specific to big-ball matches

Posted by Jessica Boucher at 03/26/2001 3:55 PM EST


Student on team #237, Sie-H2O-Bots, from Watertown High School and Eastern Awning Systems & The Siemon Company.



Ok, so all I've really done this weekend is crunch numbers....and since the big-ball matches average score/time didnt get much response, I'm posting some that are a little more....intriguing.

These are the teams from each regional who recieved the large ball multiplier the most frequently.

Regional: Team number (number of times big ball multiplier scored)

VCU: 384 (4), 497 (4)
KSC: 351 (6), 34 (5), 312 (5), 234 (5)
Long Island: 545 (5), 105 (3), 190 (3), 270 (3)
West Michigan: 71 (5), 74 (5), 67 (3), 85 (3), 302 (3), 535 (3)
Lone Star: 418 (8), 34 (6), 438 (6)
NYC: 571 (5), 371 (4), 713 (3)
NJ: 103 (6), 175 (6), 203 (5), 211 (5), 191 (4), 174 (4)
UTC: 140 (4), 230 (4), 562 (4), 131 (3), 67 (3)
SoCal: 259 (4), 698 (4), 634 (3), 691 (3)
Midwest: 234 (8), 101 (6), 71 (5), 108 (5)
Silicon Valley: 330 (5), 376 (5), 254 (4)
Philly: 103 (6), 165 (6), 56 (5), 134 (5), 293 (5), 466 (5)
Great Lakes: 280 (5), 74 (3), 85 (3)

I checked these numbers twice, but if I screwed up in the counting anywhere, please just let me know.

So....my question is, what does this data show? Does it show the best big-ball pickers? Or rather, does it show that teams dont care what ball gets picked up? Or both?

-Jessica B, #237
__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.