View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 02:51
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
This is a good thing ..........

Posted by Ed Sparks at 03/27/2001 7:40 AM EST


Engineer on team #34, The Rockets, from Bob Jones High / New Century High and DaimlerChrysler.


In Reply to: More interesting numbers...specific to big-ball matches
Posted by Jessica Boucher on 03/26/2001 3:55 PM EST:



Great job Jessica,

I believe this list represents most of the better ball handlers. My reasoning is that although I witnessed several machines (KSC & LoneStar) that can lift balls, very few could carry this task out quickly and reliably. Looking at the number of successful placements vs the number of rounds indicates to me that these machines are at least reliable and perform the task as advertised. One thing that your data does not show is placement of balls reguardless of color. We placed several balls of another color to maximize the allience score and even played a few rounds where we were to place 2 balls. I think this type of list helps us to "find" those teams who can really do what they claim which has been a major problem for us (and most of you I'm sure). What we need now is an analysis of those bridge balancers!

See 'ya in a week

Ed
Team #34


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.