Thread: More interesting numbers...specific to big-ball matches
View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 02:51
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Teams who don't worry about 10%
Posted by colleen - T190 at 03/27/2001 12:55 PM EST


Engineer on team #190, Gompei, from Massachusetts Academy of Math and Science and WPI.


In Reply to: More interesting numbers...specific to big-ball matches
Posted by Jessica Boucher on 03/26/2001 3:55 PM EST:



We are on your 'list'.. but I don't think that some of the data does disclude teams who reliably put up other teams balls.. then again, it's only data

T190 put on many more than 3 balls in Long Island, likely ditto for UTC.. also.. every match in the finals (both UTC and LongIsland) we put a big ball on..

It's a cool analysis of the data, but I can see where teams would get lost and unaccounted for...

I just hope teams take the time to look and not just fly by pre-national data when it comes time for picking.. lots of teams have made significant changes.. and lots of teams have tried to score decent points and have had partners (not them) with trouble executing..

Cool data-- I can only hope other teams only view it as such...
__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.