Thread: Look Back: Week 4
View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-03-2009, 19:44
Tetraman's Avatar
Tetraman Tetraman is offline
FIRST on my mind
AKA: Evan Raitt
no team
Team Role: Alumni
  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 1,322
Tetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Look Back: Week 4
What I have seen is a "Rock, Paper, Scissor" play style.

Rock is the heavy defence, Paper is the Super Cells, and Scissors is all out offense.

If an alliance plays Rock (defense), they can overtake Scissor's play style (offense) but can not deal with Paper (Super Cells). If an alliance plays with a Scissor (offense) style, they can easily score more points then those who play with Paper (Super Cells) but can't compete easy against incredible Rock play (defense). And finally those who go for Paper (Super Cells) can take over Rock (defense) as they can score many points with just one game peice but struggle against teams that score constantly with Scissor (offense) play.

EDIT: It's generalized for sure, and there will always be exceptions to this, but the idea is generally stable thoughout the past regionals
__________________
"For every great theory about design, there is a better and contradictory theory about design. And don't let the irony of that escape you."
Last edited by Tetraman : 23-03-2009 at 19:46.
Reply With Quote